I can only write based on what I read.
Thankfully a lot of Kashmir’s history is recorded.

It is for readers such as yourself
to judge and approve or correct what I write.

Thanks again for stopping by.

I do not see this issue ever get resolved.
The motives behind the conflict are not honestly admitted.

Civilians are victims not just of violence and abuse, but more so of propaganda.

Taking sides without trying to see the bigger picture is very divisive and simply causes more discord. I can only echo what Clapso wisely said.

Reading back the history,
Kashmir wanted to be independant and secular, and would have been today,
if Pakistan had not sent in militants to “capture” Kashmir.

In the process, it got split into fragments,
made eternal enemies between the religious groups,
displaced and made homeless many religious minorities.

Some Kashmiris look towards Pakistan for their “freedom”,
but the irony is, without Pakistan’s intervention kashmir would have never seen all these violence.

Even if they get their freedom, they will immediately get taken over by them.

It can be said that just to justify the ‘K’ in the name Pa’K'istan,
a beautiful part of the world has been ravaged and scarred forever.

everything occurs in cycles, so should war and peace.
We can all pray for that day, it will come to that,
maybe not in my life time.

The scientifically impossible I do right away
The spiritually miraculous takes a bit longer

So far I have been reading the fault is one sided,
only from the Indian forces.

Thanks.

No I am not biased.
Anything that shows up muslims or Islam in a bad light, is not necessarily biased.

I hope you understand the meaning of the title of this blog.
“kashmir myths – abuses ONLY by indian forces”.

I am highlighting the fact, that no less human rights abuses
are being committed by the Kashimiri militants on the hindus and the muslims;
the Indian forces are NOT THE ONLY party to blame; that is THE MYTH.

The highlighted texts is entirely in keeping with title of my blog. .

If I had been biased, or in denial
of the atrocities committed by indian forces, I would have excluded that entire passage.
Like the Kashmiri propaganda websites and blogs, that deny the real and the whole “bitter truth”s.

I do not see you acknowledging or commenting on the human rights atrocities being committed by the islamic militants;
I wonder who is biased here.

I never wanted to go into this issue, but
I read such a lot of blogs that are propaganda
or naive and gullible victims of such propagandas.

Besides, by writing, I myself am learning more and more everyday.

Thanks for stopping by, and for the support.