header image
 

it is time to get off our lazy backsides

 

Bengalees
it is time we shrugged off our lethargy and took control of our future.

For too long,
we have let others dictate to us,
we have buried our heads in the sand
hoping someone will come and deliver us from this evil we are in.

It doesn’t happen that way.
Life is not that easy.

Today Gujarat is showing the way,
the way that was paved by one of us, fifty six years ago.
Do you remember Shyama Prasad Mukherjee?
SP Mukherjee
Have you heard about him at all?
You have heard of the road and the college in his name,
but have you ever been curious as to who was, what was his legacy for the Hindus?

Dr. Shyama Prasad Mukherjee

He was a Barrister, the son of
Sir Ashutosh Mukherjee and Jogmaya Devi.
the youngest Vice-Chancellor of Calcutta University.
He was one of the first spokesperson for the Hindus majority.

He was never an anti-Muslim,
but felt it necessary to counteract
the communalist and separatist Muslim League of Muhammad Ali Jinnah,
who were demanding exaggerated Muslim rights or a Muslim state of Pakistan.

He strived to unite Hindu voices,
and protect us Hindus against what he believed to be
the communal propaganda and the divisive agenda of the Muslim League.

In 1951, he founded the Bharatiya Jana Sangh,
the first Hindu nationalist political party
the forerunner of the BJP.

It was SP Mukherjee who created the Hindutva agenda
later to become the wider political expression of India’s Hindu majority.

His party criticized favoritism of India’s Muslims by the Nehru administration,
he promoted free-market economics as opposed to the
socialism of Nehru’s economic and social policies.
His favored a uniform civil code for
both Hindus and Muslims, and wanted to end
the special status of Muslim-majority Jammu and Kashmir.

The Bharatiya Jana Sangh became home to many conservative members
of the Indian National Congress who were disenchanted with
socialist policies and politics of Jawaharlal Nehru
and the Congress Party.

In the 1952 general elections
SP Mookerjee was elected as an MP, his BJS won 3 seats.
As an MP, he had become a major and a vociferous threat to Nehru’s policies.

In 1953 he went to Kashmir to protest the law prohibiting Indian citizens
from settling in the state of Kashmir, a state in their own country
and the need for Indians to carry ID cards.

On 11th May, he was arrested while crossing border into Kashmir.
On 23rd May he died under mysterious circumstances whilst in detention.

His death in custody raised wide suspicion across the country
and demands were made for an independent enquiry.
His mother herself wrote to Jawaharlal Nehru,
but no enquiry commission was ever set up
the cause of his death was never known.

The legislation for ID cards did get revoked.

He had become a major threat to Nehru’s policies,
how convenient it was for Nehru, that he died in judicial custody.
In Kashmir!

Only the name Nehru has changed to Gandhi in these fifty odd years,
everything else has stayed exactly the same.

Shyama Prosad Mukherjee had seen the grim fate
of the Hindu majority under Nehru, and
he had spoken out against it.

Did he die for it? Did he die in vain?
It is time for us to get off our lazy bengali backsides and start asking questions.

 

 

 

 



TOP OF PAGE

well done, Gujarat.

 

 

India
has been held hostage by the religious minorities
by giving in to their demands, at the cost of the majorities
by the pseudo-seculars like the Congress and the Communists
by their politics of negatives ever since our independence 60 years ago.

You have proved
that politics of ideology has not died out.
that it is not necessary to pretend to be secular to fight elections
that it is no longer necessary to pander to the minorities for their votes to win.

That it is possible to win, if you stand firm in your beliefs
and deliver what you have promised
for the benefit of all.

Narendra Modi

I do not care what atrocities Mr Modi had committed,
for every act of human right abuses he may have committed,
his opponents have committed many times more, and of a nature no worse.

Thanks Gujarat,
for proving to the nation
that a time has come when one can say enough is enough
that it is not necessary to turn the other cheek, but to hit back in kind
that the time to be blackmailed by the minorities for their vote is finally over.

The Hindu majority has suffered for too long.
Our rights are no less than those of the minorities.
I hope the rest of the India wakes up and learns from you
that India is a country for all, and not just the religious minorities.

Well done, Gujarat.

BJP

 

 

 

 



TOP OF PAGE

where does the time go

 

It is coming upto a year since we started bloglogging.
We have met some nice people and many who were not so nice.

To all our new found friends,
we would like to wish our very best.
Have a lovely Christmas and a peace filled New Year.

Seasons Greetings by littleindian

 

Do not know what the new year has in store for us all.
So que sera sera, hopefully we shall meet again,

littleindian and ruffffff



TOP OF PAGE

are we hindus cowards? Oh yes and proud of it

 

 

Are we hindus cowards?

Oh yes we are, Mr Gautier, and proud to be so.
We are also apathetic, lazy and hypocrites.
Our so called patriotism is restricted to our living rooms and cricket stadiums.
And on the screens of Bollywood films.

We hindus do not care a fig,
if India eventually becomes a communist, islamic or christian state.
As long as we can ape the West, what happens to the Hindu India is not our concern.
Besides we maybe dead by then, who gives a toss about our future generations.

Been there, done it. I have aped the West to my hearts content.
Till I arrived in the west, and realise how stupid I was aping the first world apes.
The West in so many ways, is more empty than Mother Hubbard’s cupboards.

Will anyone believe me, when I write this? No they will not.
The Scotch always feels smoother going down than any desi liquors.

Please do not ask us to arise and fight, Mr Gautier,
it is uncool,
it is too much of an effort,
besides why should I die for my country, anyway?

We may be cowards, but no one dare call us stupid.

 

“ARE HINDUS COWARDS “?

– FRANCOIS GAUTIER

“Muslims are bullies and Hindus cowards”, the Mahatma Gandhi once said. He was right – at least about Hindus: there has been in the past 1400 years, since the first invasions started, very few Shivaji’s and Rajput princes to fight the bloody rule of the Moghuls, or hardly any Rani of Jhansi’s to stand against the humiliating colonial yoke of the British.

If a nation’s soul is measured by the courage of its children, then India is definitely doomed: without the Sikhs, whose bravery is unparalleled in the more recent history of India, Hindus would have even lost additional land to the Muslim invaders and there would have been infinitely more massacres of Hindus by Muslims during the first weeks of Partition.

Are Hindus more courageous since they have an independent nation (thanks – not to the non-violence of Gandhi – but to the true nationalists, such as Sri Aurobindo and Tilak, who prepared the ground for the Mahatma at the beginning of the century)?

Not at all! Because of Nehru’s absurd and naïve “hindi-chini-bhai-bhai” policy, the Indian army was shamefully routed in 1962 by the Chinese, a humiliation which rankles even today. Beijing is still able to hoodwink Indian politicians, by pretending it has good intentions, through the interviews the Chinese leaders very generously give to the Hindu newspaper (which should rightly be called the “anti-Hindu”) and Frontline (“the mouthpiece in India for the Chinese communist party”), while quietly keeping on giving nuclear know-how to Pakistan, as well as the missiles to carry their atomic warheads to Indian cities, arm separatists groups in the north-east and continuing to claim Arunachal Pradesh or Sikkim.

Everywhere in the world, Hindus are hounded, humiliated, routed, be it in Fiji where, once more, an elected democratic government was deposed in an armed coup, or in Pakistan and Bangladesh, where Muslims indulge in pogroms against Hindus every time they want to vent their hunger against India (read Taslima Nasreen’s book “Lalja”).

In Kashmir, the land of yogis, where Hindu sadhus and sages have meditated for 5000 years, Hindus have been chased out of their ancestral home by death, terror and intimidation: there were 25% of Hindus at the beginning of the century in the Kashmir valley… and hardly a handful today.

And how did India start the new millennium? By surrendering as a lamb goes to the slaughterhouse to a handful of terrorists who took over flight IC 814 from Kathmandu to Delhi (Nepal is another small inconsequential country, which owes its culture to India, but keeps on indulging India’s enemies, whether Pakistan or China)! India had the opportunity to storm the plane when it landed in Amritsar, at a time when the militants had not been furnished with explosives and more guns by the Talibans, but it did nothing out of bureaucratic bungling and sheer incapability. And not only did this Hindu Government (yes, BJP/Hindu, not Congress/Secular) make an ass of itself by calling the Talibans “friendly”, whereas all along the Talibans only helped the terrorists, but also by its weak “Gandhian” attitude, it lost any credibility in a world, where Might is the only criteria, as the US proves us every day.

And what happens when there is ONE man in India – whatever his faults, quirks, or excesses – who dares to call a spade a spade, is not afraid of words and is ready to stand-up for his opinions? Not only, of course, he is attacked by Christians and Muslims, but he is also hounded by his own brothers and sisters, the “secular” Hindus, the Human Rights activists, the journalists, the judges, the police, the (Congress) politicians! Are Hindus so intent to show the world that not only they are cowards, but also idiots? This man, of course, is Bal Thakeray.

When Bal Thakeray said, already many years ago, that there was no point in playing cricket against Pakistan, as long as Islamabad was sending militants to kill and maim into Indian territory, he was ridiculed by the secular press as fanatic and un-sportive (and cricket is certainly not a gentleman’s game as the recent scandal has shown). But he was proved right, when during Kargil, India refused – for once – to play cricket with Pakistan. When he says too, that since fourteen centuries, Muslims always strike first against Hindus, he has another good point, for those who live in Indian cities which have important Muslim minorities, will tell you that every time there are Hindu-Muslims, it is the Muslims who start them, either by attacking the police, or by provoking the Hindus.

And this is exactly what happened in Bombay, after the Ayodya mosque was brought down by Hindu militants : Muslims, angry of the “terrible” affront done to Islam, started pelting the police with stones and burning shops; but unfortunately for the Muslims, who have made of riots an art (please read the passages of the Koran which deal with riots as part of jihad), they found that for once, the Hindus under the leadership of the Shiv Sena, retaliated blow for blow – an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth – as the Israelis, who have been so long at the receiving end of Muslim bullying, say so well. It is not for us to condone violence: but how long can the Hindus be the butt of killings and persecution, be sacrificial lambs that meekly go to slaughter ?

For in a way, Gandhi was right: Muslims are bullies, they have bullied India and they continue to bully Hindu India, as Pakistan has demonstrated by receiving a well-meaning, but naïve Vajpayee at Lahore, while its soldiers were quietly invading the heights above Kargil; or as Mushraraf shows, by giving gullible Indian journalists pep talk about how he wants peace with India, while Islamabad is still training and arming murderous jihadis for Kashmir.

And what monstrous murder is Bal Thakeray accused of ? What crime against humanity has he committed? He is guilty of having written two “inflammatory” editorials in the Shiv Sena’s mouthpiece. Editorials? Inflammatory? But did Bal Thakeray ever kill anyone ? Is the man going to be arrested for having “written” something ? Are not the leaders of the Muslim organization which spearheaded the recent bombing of churches in Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh, to sow disharmony between Christians and Hindus, still scot-free, by pretending that they believe in secularism ? Has Tiger Memom, who planted deadly bombs in Bombay in 1992, ever been caught and brought to court ? Are not the Muslim organizations, which organized the bomb attacks in Coimbatore a few years back, still functioning under different names ? Isn’t it true that in Kerala, every day a new mosque is built with money coming from the Gulf and that from these mosques and madrasas the mullahs preach openly violence and anti-Hinduism ?

The truth is that there are two standards in India: one for the Hindus; and one for the Muslims. Did the “fanatic” Hindus who brought down Ayodhya (and brought shame onto secular India, according to the Indian media) kill or even injure anyone in the process? No. But Muslims do not have such qualms. When Gandhi said they were bullies, he was being very nice or very polite. For forget about the millions of Hindus killed during the ten centuries of Muslim invasions, probably the worst Holocaust in world history; forget about the hundreds of thousands of Hindu temples razed to the ground, whose destruction – whatever our “secular” Hindus of today say – was carefully recorded by the Muslims themselves, because they were proud of it (see Aurangzeb’s own chronicles); forget about the millions of Hindus forcibly converted to Islam, and who sadly are now rallying under a banner, a language, a scripture which have nothing to do with their own ethos and culture (*).

Yesterday and also today, when the Muslim world feels it has been slighted, in even a small measure by Hindus, these Infidels, who submitted meekly to Muslim rule for ten centuries, it retaliates a hundred fold – this is the only way one intimidates cowards. After Ayodhya, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia (at least in a passive way by giving shelter for a while to Tiger Memon) with the help of Indian Muslims, planted bombs in the heart of Bombay and killed a thousand innocent human beings, most of them, once more, Hindus. Tomorrow, Pakistan might wage, with the blessing of the Muslim word, the ultimate jihad against India, which if necessary, will utilise the ultimate weapon, nuclear bombs. For has not the Koran said “’Choose not thy friends among the Infidels till they forsake their homes and the way of idolatry. If they return to paganism then take them whenever you find them and kill them” (Koran 98:51-9:5-4:89) ?

Unfortunately for India, the British, when they were here, had created an intellectual elite, to act as a go-between themselves and the “natives”, which today, thanks to the Nehruvian culture of successive Congress governments, looks at its own country, not by means of its own Indian eyes, but through a western prism, as fashioned by the white colonizers and the missionaries.

These « Brown Shahibs », these true children of Macaulay, the « secular » politicians, the journalists, the top bureaucrats, in fact the whole westernised cream of India are very critical of anything Hindu. And what is even more paradoxical, is that 98% of them are Hindus !

It is they, who upon getting independence, have denied India its true identity and borrowed blindly from the British education system, without trying to adapt it to the unique Indian mentality and psychology; and it is they who are refusing to accept a change of India’s education system, which is totally western-oriented and is churning out machines, learning by heart boring statistics which are of little usefulness in life.

And what India is getting from this education is a youth which apes the West : they go to Mac Donald’s, thrive on MTV culture, wear the latest Klein jeans and Lacoste T Shirts, and in general are useless, rich parasites, in a country which has so many talented youngsters who live in poverty.

They will grow-up like millions of other western clones in the developing world, who wear a tie, read the New York Times and swear by liberalism and secularism to save their countries from doom. In time, they will reach elevated positions and write books and articles which make fun of their own country, ridicule the Bal Thakeray’s of India and put them in jail; they will preside human-right committees, be “secular” high bureaucrats who take the wrong decisions and generally do tremendous harm to India, because it has been programmed in their genes to always run down their own country.

It is said that a nation has to be proud of itself to move forward – and unless there is a big change in this intellectual elite, unless it is more conscious of its heritage and of India’s greatness, which has begun to happen in a small way, it is going to be very difficult for India to emerge as a real 21st century superpower.

One would be tempted to say in conclusion : “Arise ô Hindus, stop being cowards, remember that a nation requires Kshatriyas, warriors, to defend Knowledge, to protect one’s women and children, to guard one’s borders from the Enemy”….
And do Indians need a Bal Thakeray to remind them of that simple truth ?

FRANCOIS GAUTIER

(*) This is no to say that all Muslims are fanatics; on the contrary, many of India’s Muslims are extremely gentle and their sense of hospitality unsurpassed. The same thing can be said about Pakistan: Pakistani politicians, for instance, are much more accessible than in India and Pakistan has its own identity, which cannot be wished away.

No, the problem is not with Muslims, whether they are Indians or Pakistanis, the problem is with Islam, which teaches Indian Muslims from an early age, to look beyond their national identity to a country – the Mecca, in Saudi Arabia – which is not their country, to read a Scripture which is not written in their own language, to espouse a way of thinking, which is inimical to their own roots and indigenous culture. Indian Muslims, have to think of themselves first as Muslims and secondly only as Muslims. Muslim soldiers fighting against Pakistan in Kargil, have shown the way.

** The author will release his new book “Arise Ô India” (Har-Anand) on the 25th August at India International Centre, 1PM..

It is so fashionable to be seen as secular and to be seen to be thinking “global”,
that we feel proud to lend our voices in support of our enemies and to denounce those
who everyday risk their lives to keep our borders unbreached and our country safe.

From the comforts of our living rooms made safe by those we denounce.
We do not deny being cowards, but it is uncool to be a hindu
or to be patriotic for India.

 

 

 

 



TOP OF PAGE

lessons on how to kill hindus

and have the records erased from history.

On the day Gujrat goes to the polls, is it surprising that indian negationism raises its ugly head again; Lessons on how to demolish a mosque

The Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) excavated the mosque site at the direction of the Allahabad Bench of the Uttar Pradesh High Court in 2003. The archaeologists reported evidence of a large 10th century structure similar to a Hindu temple having pre-existed the Babri Masjid.

It is always the Marxist and Muslim historians who are in denial, and will spread unsubstantiated propaganda.

And as usual we the common hindu are guilty
of being too lazy to find the truth.
to fight for the truth.

Hindus, wake up.
The Marxists are selling off our country in the name of secularism.
Do we have to rely on foreign journalists to fight to reveal the true history?

SUPPRESSING INDIAN HISTORY by FRANCOIS GAUTIER

The anniversary of Ayodhya has come and passed. Once more, many of India’s intelligentsia felt that the destruction of the mosque has signalled the end of a certain tolerant India, for which secularism was the unifying factor and has planted a dangerous seed of Hindu “nationalism” in India’s psyche.

Yet, one should remember that the Hindu ‘fundamentalists’ did not kill a single soul in Ayodhya, whereas the bombs planted a while later in revenge by Indian Muslims with the help of Pakistan, killed more than 350 innocent human beings.

In fact, during its long history, Hinduism has been one of the most peaceful creeds in the world, accepting the reality of different beliefs, never trying to convert -even in a non-violent manner, like the Buddhists did in Asia – and submitting itself rather meekly, except for a Shivaji, a Guru Gobind or a Rani of Jhansi, to numerous invasions.

The same thing cannot be said about Islam, whatever N. Ram says in Frontline. Many historians, amongst them Will Durant, Louis Frederick, or Alain Danielou, have remarked that the Muslim invaders were so certain that they were doing their holy duty by razing temples and killing Hindus, that they had recorded down carefully and proudly their deeds in their own archives.

Mahmud of Ghazni, for instance, who patronised art and literature, would recite a verse of the Koran every night after having razed temples and killed his quota of unbelievers.

Firuz Shah Tughlak, personally confirms that the destruction of Pagan temples was done out of piety and writes: “on the day of a Hindu festival, I went there myself, ordered the executions of all the leaders and practionners of his abomination; I destroyed their idols temples and built mosques in their places”.

Aurangzeb did not just build an isolated mosque on a razed temple, as Romila Thapar would like us to believe, he ordered all temples destroyed, among them the Kashi Vishvanath, one of the most sacred places of Hinduism and had mosques built on a number of cleared temples sites. All other Hindu sacred places within his reach equally suffered destruction, with mosques built on them.

A few examples:
Krishna’s birth temple in Mathura,
the rebuilt Somnath temple on the coast of Gujurat,
the Vishnu temple replaced with the Alamgir mosque now overlooking Benares and
the Treta-ka-Thakur temple in Ayodhya.

The number of temples destroyed by Aurangzeb is counted in 4, if not 5 figures. This is a small excerpt of his own official court chronicles:

“Aurangzeb ordered all provincial governors to destroy all schools and temples of the Pagans and to make a complete end to all pagan teachings and practices”.

Or::

“Hasan Ali Khan came and said that 172 temples in the area had been destroyed… His majesty went to Chittor and 63 temples were destroyed. Abu Tarab, appointed to destroy the idol-temples of Amber, reported that 66 temples had been razed to the ground“..

Aurangzeb did not stop at destroying temples, their users were also wiped-out; even his own brother, Dara Shikoh, was executed for taking an interest in Hindu religion and the Sikh Guru Tegh Bahadur was beheaded because he objected to Aurangzeb’s forced conversions.

As we can see Romila Thapar and Percival Spear’s statement of a benevolent Aurangzeb is a flagrant attempt at negationism (the negation of historical crimes). Even the respectable Encyclopedia Brittannica in its entry on India, does not mention in its chapter on the Sultanate period any persecutions of Hindus by Muslims, except “that Firuz Shah Tughlaq made largely unsuccessful attempts at converting his Hindu subjects and sometime persecuted them”.

Indian school books seem to have taken their cue from the Encyclopedia Brittannica , as there is hardly any mention of this dark aspect of India’s past. But why does India negate its history? We know that Nehru and Gandhi wanted to keep Pakistan within India and wished to avoid the splintering away of Muslim groups. But was it a good enough reason to suppress information about Muslim atrocities during ten centuries of bloody invasions and the massive destruction of Hindu temples ? On the contrary this has only created more terrorism.

Denying and suppressing the history cannot keep the harmony. In its place, truth and reconciliation are necessary. Hiding the truth denies sympathy to the victim, civilization and culture. A nation unless, it is ready to face its own history – the Good and the Bad, the Courageous and the Cowardly – can never bloom into its full plenitude. Hidden aspects of its own history sooner or later will surface and bring with them the guilt, anger, regret, which are the necessary ingredients to wipe-off that particular black karma.

In Germany, for instance, Germans have been reminded again and again about the atrocities committed by the Nazis during World War II, and that has brought a sense of guilt, which has acted as a deterrent to future atrocities. The Jews have constantly tried, since the Nazi genocide, to keep alive the remembrance of their six million martyrs. This has got nothing to do with vengeance.

Do the Jews of today want to retaliate upon contemporary Germany? No. It is only a matter of making sure that history does not repeat its mistakes, as alas it is doing today in India : witness the persecution of Hindus in Kashmir, whose 250.000 Pandits have fled their 5000 year old homeland, or the oppression of Hindus in Bangladesh and Pakistan.

To remember, is to be able to look at today with the wisdom of yesterday.

No collective memory should be erased for appeasing a particular community. Hiding the facts and justifying past Muslim crimes has led to terrorism in the Indian sub-continent. Muslims were never held accountable. One of the first steps to curb violence is to make one aware of past mistakes. Guilt in the culprit and forgiveness in the victim can put an end to self-righteousness and the kind of terrorism we see today in Kashmir, in spite of India’s peace overtures.

This is not a call to take up arms, this is a call to find the truth,
and to reveal to the world the liars who have had it too easy for too long.

 

 

 

 



TOP OF PAGE